upvote
hah, I've got something for your anti bds law if you're put in front of court:

funding Israel violates the separation of church and state.

reply
You don't even need to go that far. These anti-BDS laws are clearly against the constitution and get struck down without issue. The real problem is that it's much easier to create these BS laws and put them on the books than it is to repeal them, because repealing them requires court challenges, lawsuits, and then these supporters go and make alterations to the law to meet the criteria of the challenges and ram them through again. Then we go through this whole cycle all over again. To solve this problem, you really need to go after the public officials that are being pushed to pass this garbage by consistently holding their feet to the fire and not tolerating this with punishments of losing their elections. The country is shifting towards that, but there's so much BS going on elsewhere that this takes a back burner in people's minds.
reply
[flagged]
reply
[flagged]
reply
This doesn't work anymore give it up man
reply
What doesn't work? Comparing people's rhetoric?
reply
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whataboutism

  "Whataboutism" or "whataboutery" (as in, "but what about X?") refers to the propaganda strategy of responding to an accusation with a counter-accusation instead of offering an explanation or defense against the original accusation. It is an informal fallacy that the accused party uses to avoid accountability [...]
reply
I do think your goal is to smear me since everything I said is true and you didn’t address any of my points. You can start with the anti-BDS laws.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-BDS_laws

reply
I don't want to smear you... proceeds to try to smear you
reply