undefined

points

[-]

> Early-2025 AI

This one especially really just shows they are cherry picking things which support a particular position regardless of the relevance, the difference between Early-2025 AI and Late-2026 AI is absolutely massive. Early 2026 it was reported by Greg Kroah-Hartman that AI bug reports rapidly went from obviously wrong or low quality to being real reports.[0] The kernel now has AI tooling heavily integrated into patch review workflows as well with quite good results.[1]

> They have plenty of reasons not to.

Not really any good reasons however.

[0] https://www.theregister.com/software/2026/03/26/linux-kernel...

[1] https://github.com/sashiko-dev/sashiko

by bigstrat20032 hours ago|

parent|

[-]

> the difference between Early-2025 AI and Late-2026 AI is absolutely massive

No. No it is not, despite how many times AI proponents like to claim it is.

by ahelwer1 hours ago|

parent|

[-]

Unfortunately it is. Thought the whole thing was a scam until six months ago. I think pretty highly of my development skills and have to be objective and admit I am outclassed in debugging and operational tasks now (and it isn't close). Writing non-script code isn't quite there yet (they are bad at abstraction) but I can't confidently predict how much longer that will be the case.

by jameshilliard2 hours ago|

parent|

prev|

[-]

> No. No it is not, despite how many times AI proponents like to claim it is.

Why do you think there isn't a huge difference? I've used AI tools over this time period and the difference is very obvious.