upvote
Agreed, but I also don't really care as long as it's usable. Some flat design made things harder to see/read, but by Sequoia, they'd figured out how much depth needed to be added. Tahoe / Liquid Glass is whatever, I have high-contrast mode which nullifies it.
reply
I thought Maverick reduced the skeuomorphism, I was glad to see it removed. Apple had got to a point where shadows and reflections weren't consistent between icons and windows and the Dock. Briefly, Microsoft lead good design with Metro and the flat, minimal background noise.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metro_(design_language)

https://www.macworld.com/article/222218/get-to-know-os-x-mav...

reply
I felt like Mavericks had just the right amount of skeuomorphism. Not enough to be annoying but just enough to be aesthetic.

I was never a fan of the Metro flat design that took over, though admittedly my desktop now is a purposefully unsexy Sway desktop that is completely flat and I do like that.

reply