upvote

points

by BoingBoomTschak4 hours ago |
comments
upvoteby stuxnet794 hours ago|
next
[-]
Once I saw that Kobo was going all in on the color e-readers I decided I'm going to sit this whole trend out and bought another Aura One. Between it and the one I currently own they should carry me for a long, long time.

The Aura One is essentially perfect. The only gripes I have are the USB port and non-removable battery. It is a bit slow with the stock OS but with KOreader it runs amazingly well.

reply
upvoteby teroshan4 hours ago|
prev|
next
[-]
I'm in the exact same situation, still rocking an Aura One with KOReader and can't find anything with that form factor in black/white that satisfies me.

There's something to be said with a device that has a single purpose and supports custom firmware: other than the micro-USB port and the slightly shorter battery charge I don't think I will be changing it soon.

reply
upvoteby jdprgm3 hours ago|
prev|
next
[-]
I also have a kobo aura one and was just recently researching potential upgrades and was shocked even looking outside of strictly kobo that I couldn't find anything that was a clear upgrade or equivalent on various features against it. For a product almost ten years old it's so weird.
reply
upvoteby abletonlive3 hours ago|
prev|
[-]
Color is a gimmick for e-ink now? I wonder if people thought the same thing when they brought color to television.
reply
upvoteby daemonologist1 hours ago|
parent|
next
[-]
For pure reading of text it provides minimal benefit (color highlighting and cover art, mostly) while costing contrast ratio and dollars. Especially since some devices (e.g. Kobo Libra) are now offered only with a color display, I can see why someone would call it a gimmick. I personally view the reflectivity of eink as the entire point and thus have no interest in it.

That said, of course if you want to view color content on an EPD then it is quite necessary and not a gimmick at all.

reply
upvoteby izacus2 hours ago|
parent|
prev|
next
[-]
It comes with a massive loss of contrast so it's a bit of a gimmick, yeah.
reply
upvoteby abletonlive2 hours ago|
parent|
[-]
That doesn't mean it's a gimmick. Again, I implore you to actually look up what "gimmick" means. Just because there's a tradeoff doesn't mean that it's a gimmick. In fact, the very issue that you're talking about is something that is improving from Kaleido 3 to Kaleido 4. So even people that use this argument have something to take note of in this release.

When we went from black & white photography to color photography we also introduced a lot of tradeoffs. Would you have considered color photography a gimmick ?

reply
upvoteby kevin_thibedeau1 hours ago|
parent|
[-]
> Would you have considered color photography a gimmick ?

It sucked or was massively inconvenient for the first 50+ years.

reply
upvoteby jkestner2 hours ago|
parent|
prev|
[-]
Color ink remains a niche in books.
reply
upvoteby abletonlive2 hours ago|
parent|
[-]
Perhaps revisiting what "gimmick" means would help you. Plenty of people use their e-ink readers to look at magazines, comics, news. Plenty of people have a highlighting system. Arguing that color is a "gimmick" is silly considering there are practical applications of color, as we can see around us in the real world. Some of you are seriously living in the weirdest of bubbles.

Biology spent a ton of time adapting and evolving for the ability to see color but sure, it's a gimmick. I guess you should consider syntax highlighting a gimmick in code editors as well? Charts/graphs in textbooks use color as a gimmick, any book that include illustrations/images in color are gimmicks

reply
upvoteby jkestner1 hours ago|
parent|
[-]
Pal, I’m not the one who used the word. I am observing that books are predominantly black ink in white paper, despite color ink being around before the printing press.
reply