upvote
Just to be clear: there are humans choosing to have the car operate. That's not just semantics. Responsibility lies with the people making the choice to cause a system to operate.
reply
So we should start arresting engineers and executives?
reply
If people act with gross negligence, then yes, we should arrest them. How that is defined may depend on a variety of factors, though, and is something that already has relevant case law in related fields.
reply
Executives, definitely yes. One person should be responsible for automated systems and services. The CEO is the most logical choice.
reply
Immediately stop all Waymo's in the jurisdiction, start legal proceeding against the company. Someone signed off on software/hardware that lacked sufficient protections, find out who.
reply
> Immediately stop all Waymo's in the jurisdiction

When we start taking idiot drivers' licenses away, sure. Otherwise this is a silly overreaction with a calculable cost in human lives.

reply
>Someone signed off on software/hardware that lacked sufficient protections, find out who.

Crashed prod? Straight to jail.

reply
Bridge collapsed? Straight to jail.
reply
not true: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tacoma_Narrows_Bridge_(1940) nothing happened to the lead designer (Moisseiff) or engineer (Eldridge)
reply
> nothing happened to the lead designer (Moisseiff) or engineer (Eldridge)

It's a joke–a riff on a Parks and Recs meme making fun of Venezuela at the time. We don't jail aircraft engineers when they make a mistake because just sending people to jail doesn't work as well as encouraging them to co-operate ex post facto so the root cause can be identified.

reply
>It's a joke–a riff on a Parks and Recs meme making fun of Venezuela at the time.

Poe's law strikes again. Of course nobody thinks crashing prod should result in jail, or most software engineers would have spent some time behind bars by now. However it's entirely unclear whether @CountHackulus meant "of course autonomous car engineers should be jailed, just as if an engineer signed off on faulty plans" (which to be fair, also happens), or is just repeating my joke with bridges.

reply
> of course nobody thinks crashing prod should result in jail

You'd be surprised at how many intelligent people really do want this.

reply
Exactly, people on HN want new laws passed every time Cloudflare goes down for 5 minutes
reply
To be fair, Cloudflare is near or at the point where they should be regulated as a utility.
reply
Sure, but it's not a cop's job to perform legal proceedings.
reply
Are you referring to the actual case mentioned here, where a car passed slowly through a market and... that was all what happened?
reply
Aren’t waymos actually much safer and have less incidents per mile compared with human drivers? (Yes, they are and yes they do)
reply
A driver's license suspension would be sufficient, say for six months or so?
reply
Depends on the circumstances, if it's a mechanical issue without an obvious cause neither the car or driver gets suspended.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2009%E2%80%932011_Toyota_vehic...

reply
What do you believe is the correct course of action for law enforcement to take in this situation?

https://apnews.com/article/robot-germany-sexual-assault-colo...

Can you extend that to this situation?

reply