That's not incompatible with many people being unproductive. If you blanket terminate, some of them will have been contributing
replyboth things can be true: many people play unnecessary telephone + removing those people disrupts the organization
replyBoth are probably true to some extent, and would vary a lot between different orgs.
> removing those people disrupts the organization
replyOr worse, you removed the workers and left the 'telephone' people.
In my anecdotal experience, MOST companies don't take any time to understand what they are cutting.
They kill "Project X" so the easy answer is that everyone involved with Project X must go. Regardless if they were useful or could be useful elsewhere.
Or they cut by salary, employment length, etc.
Yeah, the idea that there is a rampant amount of slack in the modern US corporation is just odd. Go speak to workers and ask them if they feel that they have slack.
replySlack hasn't been a thing for like 40 years, in fact it's mostly the opposite I'd argue where there is such little slack that employers often steal wages from their workers to gain even more profits.