upvote
I like how "Jetson car" goes from driving George to work through the air to "10 seconds of air time is a Jetson car." No, it is nothing like the Jetsons. It is a cold air bomb waiting to explode and there is zero chance of it actually hitting the road other than in a few fake forms to pretend they did it.
reply
I felt the same way when they were calling the Segway skateboards "hoverboards" and referring to back to the future.
reply
I'm not sure I'd agree that "Traditional wheel powered transportation vehicle" is in the same category as "Useless hovering car with giant dangerous high-pressure nitrogen tank that can cause serious bodily injury to pedestrians and occupants"
reply
On the other hand "Hoverboards" became famous for bursting into flames so vigorously that people thought they were exploding, so maybe there is a deep connection. Then again "Hoverboards" were actually available on the market as advertised for quite some time, which is probably going to differentiate them from yet another Musk gimmick.

Add it to the list, boys! "Inflatable Rescue Submersible", FSD, Bulletproof windows, Mars any day now, Hyperloop... am I missing anything?

reply
I guess any LPG-installed car is also a "bomb" by your definition?
reply
my quick search says LPG-installed cars run at 5-10 bar. the roadster apparently at 350 bar. by comparison one is on the scale of car tires and the other is like 35x that.
reply
Using Brode's equation a rupture can release 52MJ of energy or 12kg of TNT. An high explosive tank shell only has 11MJ of explosive energy.
reply
But also LPG is extremely flammable, while air isn't, and air can be safely leaked in emergency.
reply
This is enough pressure to launch a car and flip it in the air, you can't just "safely leak" it at any useful rate of speed in an emergency. In an emergency it will rapidly explode.
reply
deleted
reply
For reference, tractor trailer tires run about 7 bar and we’ve all see those videos.
reply
It's basically the batmobile from Dark Knight. A small bridge jumper. Still pretty cool
reply
Didn’t that also actually work? IIRC they wanted to develop something that could realistically do it. This seems to confirm: https://batmobilehistory.com/tumbler-batmobile.php
reply
The Batpod bike was also practical, although infamous for being super hard to drive unlike the batmobile leading to a now infamous crash with an imax camera: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CdMpxN-7_rw
reply
>A small bridge jumper.

Or an easier way to escape rioters blocking the road and threatening your life.

reply
Imagine what these air blasters would do to a pedestrian. This is never going to hit the road like shown.
reply
Not just pedestrians. Nearby car windshields.
reply
I think future technology will allow the car to detect another car or pedestrian too close to the exhaust system and disengage it. I don’t know, some wild thought I just had.
reply
You can't just "disengage" a car that's six feet off the ground. You have to land it gently with the nozzle engaged or you don't have a car anymore, and maybe you don't have a driver either.
reply
[dead]
reply
deleted
reply
deleted
reply
Do you feel the same way about every Red Bull stunt?
reply
You think the jetsons vehicle wasn’t a flying bomb? You’re comparing a real, actually-flying car with a cartoon fantasy and complaining the real one isn’t real enough? I don’t even understand what the point here is
reply
The point is that a car flying for 10 seconds is nowhere near the Jetsons car.

We actually do already have Jetsons style flying cars - those things that look kind of like big drones are basically that, and those are actually practical.

Forget the comparison to the Jetsons if it upsets you, let's just compare to actual flying vehicles.

reply
I was mostly being pedantic in response to the extreme pedantry required to differentiate between “doing a barrel roll using cold gas thrusters” and “flying”. My point is that it is of course flying, and the reason cars don’t fly at all normally is because it’s insanely dangerous, so saying it’s not a flying car because it’s dangerous is both disingenuous and wrong.
reply
Now do the definition of AGI.
reply
I bet Tesla is kicking themselves for not consulting mulletbum before building. They could have caught this if only the actual engineers at Tesla had your input.
reply
It doesn't have to be pressurized at all times!

You could only pressurize it right before your jumping stunt.

reply
Highly practical. Basically a clown car.
reply
You know the force from these thrusters is going to injure a pedestrian and the whole idea will be scrapped.

They can’t even build a proper Mini anymore because the hood was so low it elked pedestrians face first into the windshield.

reply
If the flying version is ever sold (unlikely) it will be subject to flying thing rules (FAA). Best case it would be like buying a used F1 car from Ferrari. They retain possession and you get to occasionally fly in on the private jet and drive it under supervision on a racetrack.

It’s cool tech demo. I’m not expecting to see one fly in private hands ever.

reply
People saying the flying features are wildly impractical, potentially dangerous, and a waste of space, weight and money which make it worse at being a car are correct.

However, those assuming it will never be sold or even legal to be sold may not be aware there already exist astronomically expensive, completely impractical, quite unsafe, track-only hypercars which are not legal to drive on any street.

As for the technical legality of the 'flying' features ask your LLM about: the Ground-Effect & "Sustained Flight" Jurisdictional Boundary in FAA / NHTSA regs, Off-Road Track-Only exemptions from Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards, and PHMSA / DOT-SP (Special Permit) authorization for consumer COPV pressure vessels. Making the "hopping" version for sale is a wildly impractical marketing stunt but they can probably do it, although it'll cost far more and ship much later than whatever they promise and will sell at most a few dozen.

reply
It's never going to be street legal, and I doubt there was ever a plan to try.
reply
The cybertruck is so dangerous to pedestrians it would never pass homologation pretty much anywhere outside of USA, and yet it sells there. If the roadster is sold anywhere it will be there too.
reply
Honey, did you remember to also charge the compressed gas tank on the Tesla?

Sorry, I'll start it from the app!

chug chug chug chug

reply
From the interview, they says it takes 6-8 hours to fill and you get 1 "launch" before its depleted in under a second.
reply
This is just gooning with a drivetrain.
reply
Opposite of gooning no? More like Mr. 2 seconds leaving one's partner stimulated but unfulfilled.
reply
I think they more meant the "6-8 hours to fill and you get 1 launch" aspect. The gooning starts in the garage.
reply
Of all things, how is this the most reasonable, even-handed disagreement in this thread?
reply
Because that's how things work now. But also, no disagreement, the gooning is absolutely in the 6-8 hours not the 5 seconds of joy joy.
reply