upvote

points

by nubinetwork4 hours ago |
comments
upvoteby ianburrell4 hours ago|
next
[-]
The big problem used to be that people would buy unlocked Baofengs and accidentally use them on licensed services thinking there were generic walkie talkies. The current locked down rules prevent that. They can still get amateur handhelds and use without ham license, but hams police that. It is also easier to get FRS/GMRS handhelds for pubic use, many the same models reprogrammed.

Unlocking handhelds is less of a problem because it requires deliberate action to break the rules. There are fewer people willing and able to do that.

reply
upvoteby sc68cal4 hours ago|
prev|
next
[-]
There are older UV-5R Baofengs that are in demand because they didn't have the software restriction that newer ones have. It's not that they're hacked, it's that they were not locked from the factory
reply
upvoteby Manuel_D4 hours ago|
parent|
next
[-]
Are newer baofengs locked down? I thought you can still just hold down 3 buttons while power cycling the radio to unlock TX from 400 to 520 MHz.

Regardless, the Quansheng UV-K5 is largely supplanting the Baofeng as the go-to entry level HT, the 3rd party firmware for that radio is pretty impressive.

reply
upvoteby antonymoose4 hours ago|
parent|
prev|
next
[-]
I haven’t bought a UV-5R since 2024. That one is as unlockable with a trivial sequence of inputs.

Are modern varieties truly locked or just “locked ;)” ?

reply
upvoteby seany2 hours ago|
parent|
prev|
[-]
Almost all "real" ham radios can be unlocked anyway, and have much better RF performance.
reply
upvoteby devin4 hours ago|
prev|
[-]
I know nothing about this stuff. Is it only chatting on bands that is considered problematic? Are you allowed to listen on any frequency?
reply
upvoteby ThinkingGuy3 hours ago|
parent|
next
[-]
Licensed US amateur operator here. In general the FCC regulations allow you to listen on whatever frequencies you like, EXCEPT the cellular frequencies (This dates back to the analog era, before cellular traffic was encrypted). Some jurisdictions may also have restrictions on, for example, using a police scanner in a vehicle, that would restrict listening (even though most of that traffic is now also encrypted).
reply
upvoteby mindcrime3 hours ago|
parent|
[-]
Don't quote me on this, but I believe there's some more nuance to the cellular band issue. What's restricted, AFAIK, isn't simply receiving traffic on those frequencies in and of itself, but:

1. Decrypting those communications if they are encrypted

and

2. Selling equipment designed to receive on those bands.

Of course there's not much purpose in sitting around listening to the digital chirping noises of encrypted traffic, but as I understand it, if that's your hobby, that part is actually legal.

(Also a licensed US ham, not not an expert in anything in particular and definitely not a lawyer)

reply
upvoteby skinfaxi3 hours ago|
parent|
[-]
I would be surprised if it were illegal to tune into something being broadcast in public over the air. Decryption is a different story.
reply
upvoteby kmeisthax2 hours ago|
parent|
[-]
Get ready to be surprised, because the 800Mhz band used for AMPS (1G / analog cellular) was explicitly carved off as a no-receive zone by Congress because AT&T was pissed[0] anyone could just listen in on any cellphone conversation. I'm told the law actually makes it really difficult to legally sell fully open software-defined radios (SDR), even though nobody uses analog cellular anymore, because you still have to design the SDR to be tamper-proof against attempts to receive 800Mhz.

[0] Wikipedia also mentions the existence of cloning tools that would let you copy any AMPS subscriber ID and program another phone with the same number, stealing the subscriber's account. I suspect AT&T was more angry about that.

reply
upvoteby 3 hours ago|
parent|
prev|
[-]
deleted
reply