upvote
> but it looks like a practically useless vehicle for 99.9999% of the population

Well it's effectively useless for 100% of the population. It's just that 99.9999% cannot afford an expensive, useless car. Some people can, though.

reply
There was a Fan Car in F1 decades ago. Was good until it was banned!
reply
At race speeds (say over ~150 mph), you don't even need a fan or any active mechanism. Just passive venturi channels on the underside can generate so much down force they are strictly limited in F1 because they can easily enable cars to sustain extremely unsafe speeds.

There are some McLaren street cars that use passive venturi channels which from their shape alone, generate more down force at high speeds than the car's weight. In theory, the car could drive upside down (if there was a Daytona-sized race track shaped like a ~30 ft diameter pipe).

reply
Yeah, it turns out that in very specific and controlled situations, using a fan to make downforce is great. It's also a very obvious thing to do in those situations and doesn't do much for you otherwise.

Imagine a normal car having to carry around the added weight of fans, COPVs, and the plumbing to make it work. And only being able to use those only if the track is clean and there are no other cars nearby.

reply
deleted
reply
You actually raise interesting point. What if we could remove bunch of complicated suspension and replace with a simple fan?
reply
What suspension would you recommend removing? Are you envisioning some ridiculous Flymo-style car? I can attest that a Flymo lawnmower collapses onto the floor when its weight increases (eg with wet grass).
reply
They make those - they are called hovercrafts. They tend to have lots of maintenance issues.
reply
This is like asking to imagine a Hoover vacuum to have those fans. It’s silly because it would never happen. This is not a normal car. Comparing it to a normal car makes no sense.
reply
The Chaparral 2j is one of the most inventive and cool looking cars I've seen.

Not f1, Can-Am but yeah, I'm really surprised this isn't a more common approach to modern track cars. Obviously banned in most motorsport but I'm surprised with all of the one-offs these days that it's not more common.

reply
Yeah, lots of prior art for fan cars.
reply
Because nobody wants to be on a road/racetrack with a car that will pelt the car behind it with stones it pulls from the tarmac
reply
It has pretty good filtration [1], and redundant fans. Some rocks aren't a problem. But, you can't be driving through LA.

[1] https://youtu.be/xkXvL8YCtIE?t=721

reply
You can’t drive it anywhere that manhole covers might exist, lest you destroy the car and/or turn the manhole cover into a deadly projectile.
reply
deleted
reply