> That seems clearly not the case here, normal people don't write like this:

I think when you repeatedly expose and immerse yourself to such a degree in reading and writing language, it brushes off on oneself. So I could also absolutely believe someone from Anthropic wrote this.

100%, although if people are getting 90% of their interaction from a robot, one may start to pick up some vocal tics and colloquialisms from machine world. a kind of robo-pidgin.

It felt weird reading it because every once in awhile there were some well written sentences and coherent paragraphs, then it fell back into Claudisms.

this definitely seemed like something claude generated, i know because i frequently do all my research in chat and then ask it to generate a doc based on what we talked about and when i read what it generates the verbosity, the style it writes in makes me delete the whole thing. I would never subject readers to that.

Pangram reports 80% of the text is AI-generated: https://www.pangram.com/history/72309aad-6e3f-4002-bdc5-c062...