Oh they’re a YC company: https://www.ycombinator.com/companies/opencode
replyThe title should say "OpenCode Console" not "OpenCode".
replyYeah that’s a big difference
replyHow did you determine that it has been "flagged by many"?
replyInteresting, #1 raw rank yet never made it past ~#10 - haven’t seen that specifically: https://news.social-protocols.org/stats?id=50133401
replyThanks for the detailed metrics. This proves my point...
replyIt's clearly heavily down voted, just look at when it was added, how many points it has and its relative position.
replyYou cant downvote HN posts (comments you can)
replyThey presumably meant that it’s been downranked relative to what you’d expect from a post with that many upvotes in that short of a time frame. Hundreds of upvotes in a few hours is usually a top 5 post
replyAfaik flagging acts like a super-downvote as far as the algorithm is concerned
replyYes flagging is super downvote
replyThe post was visible when I am logged in. But when I opened the /newest page on incognito the post wasn't there.
replyIt’s #14 on homepage when not logged in, same as when logged in.
replyNow it is
replyThen next time do a less clickbait-y title: OpenCode had a leak of API keys for their service that is similar to OpenRouter; this does not affect most users.
replyIt's a little more than that. It seems that keys for OpenAI / Anthropic APIs that were STORED on OpenCode's OpenRouter-like backend got leaked – which additionally means that OpenCode has no ability to refund people for their losses.
reply> which additionally means that OpenCode has no ability to refund people for their losses.
replyIf they took payment, they are liable and they must have the ability to refund.
I guess Anthropic and OpenAI might refund based on good will.
reply... no, I don't think so? Taking payment for <X> (providing a proxy/platform for hosting/proxying to agents) doesn't mean that you're inherently liable for <Y>, if <Y> is 'bring your own key from a third-party provider'.
reply