undefined

points

[-]

> All it ever did was give people free model for title gen,

All it "ever did" was send your entire prompt/context to a "free" model for harvesting. The astroturfing in this thread is absurd.

by Reyonlds9636 minutes ago|

parent|

[-]

It sent the prompt to a GPT-5-nano model with the max zdr you can get on openai. That was done to give people free title gen, unless they set it themselves. Title gen does not send anything but the prompt.

Maybe try a sensible approach first, cause so far this is assumed, for no reason, to be done maliciously. "to steal data" and the like.

Opencode's source code is public, so you can verify any claim against it directly.

by NavinF32 minutes ago|

parent|

[-]

but the prompt was sent to OpenAI via Opencode's servers right? So even when you use a local model, Opencode can still see your prompt by default?

by Reyonlds9627 minutes ago|

parent|

[-]

It was going through zen, so they CAN see it if they want to. Same applies to anything on Zen. But, zen is ZDR. Same goes to any provider, ZDR or not, as ZDR is just an agreement. With Openai - caveats apply on Openai side itself(they retain logs regardless).

During this short period - yes. Unless it finds a valid small model, or you set one yourself - it would use the one provided by zen. or you could disable it with an invalid model altogether. Good gesture for most users and something else to others.

It's *could by the way, as this was only a short window when this was a thing. It went back to not having this fallback pretty fast, i don't think it even lasted a month.