upvote
There is another one, which is not a transpiler: https://github.com/rochus-keller/luon
reply
> Fennel (Lisp-y),

For all (most?) intents and purposes, Fennel is lisp-language, not just lisp-y. It's Clojure-y if anything, which makes sense considering the creator of Fennel.

reply
Hehe, I swear anytime Fennel is mentioned this discussion comes up, no matter what the original statement is. It’s like code golfers discussing Esolang Turing completeness. :)

FWIW I didn’t mean to imply anything here, just draw the parallel between the ergonomics of transpiled Lua. Spiritually I consider Lua to be a Lisp, and Fennel a tool for revealing this quality. I’ve actually recently combined Teal and Fennel to create a statically typed Fennel compiler, which really improves QoL for larger projects. I’m doomed to enjoy lispy or command invocation languages, both of which have fallen out of style.

Lots to learn from each.

reply
Do you have a link to that statically typed Fennel compiler? That sounds fascinating.
reply
> considering the creator of Fennel

Techomancy is Fennel's maintainer, but Calvin Rose created it (and then Janet). Here are interviews with both:

- technomancy https://alexalejandre.com/interviews/interview-with-technoma...

- calvin rose https://alexalejandre.com/interviews/interview-with-bakpakin...

reply
> (Ruby-ish)

Thanks for the chuckle.

reply
They both have type systems and such. The comparison doesn't have to be about the compilation/transpilation process, but the developer experience is still important.
reply
deleted
reply