“99% success” is too vague to be especially meaningful in such different use cases.
reply99% successful web development where the 1% missing is security that and the company leaks its entire repository of user data every few months is not good.
99% successful car driving where 99% of 5-year periods have zero accidents per car is an order of magnitude safer than the average driver. (And gut feeling, I suspect approaching the tail-end of the safest drivers on the road.)
An LLM automating web developers basically puts the company out of business. Why would customers pay a developer when they can just build it themselves?
reply>quickly rise to the leading cause of death under 30 if widely deployed.
replyWait, aren't human-driven cars already the leading cause of death under 30?
Examples?
replythe point was that 99% rate of success is good enough when failure means nothing, not so much when it means dead people.
reply