>Your question implies that anyone who has not seen this latest film about Holmes is unqualified to form an opinion about her guilt or innocence.
replyNo, my question was meant to imply that someone who hasn't seen the film is unqualified to discuss what's contained in that film. You weren't just making definitive statements about Holmes, you were making definitive statements about the movie itself without having seen it.
I hope you watch the movie and can eventually look back on this comment.
replyThe part I cannot understand about this so-called documentary is simply this: Insofar as (1) Elizabeth Holmes is a felon who was found guilty of massive fraud based on overwhelming evidence against her, and (2) the facts in the case are nowhere in dispute, then what difference does it make what she is saying now? She's a known liar, fraudster and felon. So why does anyone care that she continues to spin her lies and falsify her frauds? I mean, if this pseudo-documentary were intended as comedy or satire, that would make perfect sense. But the fact that so many people seem to be taking her claims seriously, against all the factual evidence, is what I cannot understand.
replydeleted
reply