> A reminder that this cannot falsify the existence of an exploit, trivial or otherwise.
replyNo, it's a not a zero knowledge proof. But if the site owner is a generally trustworthy person, then I feel that this effort is strong proof the exploit is not trivial.
A reminder that this cannot falsify the existence of an exploit, trivial or otherwise.
replyIt can only show you if someone has used an exploit against this server.
It cannot even show that. The server can lie (trivially).
replyThe block chain can't though once the coins are transferred
replyThat assumes the key is actually on the server.
replyI assume even if it isn't, attacker could deface the website so heavily everyone would know they win.
replyThe server could simply be running a patched PHP.
replySure. Also, we have to trust owner of the site. So it cannot show anything, strictly speaking.
Still, it maybe puts a price on exploit demo. Some say "it goes around twitter", "bots are probing and exploiting it", "it's a biggest thing ever in cybersec history, invest in AI now". Some say "it's a fud".
replyAre these 500$ laying on a ground for anyone to take?