undefined

points

[-]

Remarkable in what way? Sounds completely unremarkable to me.

Oh wow, someone did a dance, and then someone copied it, and then someone copied it, and then someone copied it, and then..

by dylan6049 hours ago|

parent|

[-]

It's remarkable in how hive mind works I guess. It's mindless pablum to the nth degree. The thing I find remarkable is how it shows how easy it is to influence someone. The psychology PhDs that the Chinese hired earned their money to be sure. TikTok has to be the most well funded psychology study ever implemented to the point that the users don't even know they are test subjects

by dodger-dog6 hours ago|

parent|

[-]

I see it. In a discussion about entertainment sources loosing market share, I suggested that TikTok was a likely reason. When someone's "scruples" were inferred to be poor by merely using the TikTok platform, I pointed out that "scruples" have more to do with what shows up in your feed (suggesting the user bears responsibility) and described my experience as humanizing, entertaining, less of a demand on my time, and provided a sense of global community through dancing and singing. It was then that you introduced the "hive mind" concept.

One tell of a hive minded thinker is when they have knee jerk reactions to things and shoot from the lip.

by intended4 hours ago|

parent|

[-]

Personal responsibility when sitting in front of a box of candy in your own house and choosing to eat it or not is a reasonable expectation.

Personally responsibility, when averaged out to billions of people, being given choices based on the work of scientists, engineers and researchers, with no barrier to leverage your neurology and data?

I have never perfectly understood how we reconcile what happens at scale, where its trillions of choices every minute, over the user base the size of several countries with individual responsibility.

The best answer I have is that it should be a fair fight / Fair choice. There should be a reasonable expectation of what the average outcome in a given situation is, and the players should have equal ability to engage in that transaction.

Your experience being humanizing is one experience, the average experience being dehumanizing is still entirely possible.

by dodger-dog4 hours ago|

parent|

[-]

In the alternative: you do it to yourself, lack the emotional maturity, responsibility, and fortitude to even begin to do anything about it, and to protect your fragile sense of self worth and self-deceptive identity from the cognitive dissonance, blame evil scientists, engineers, and researchers for controlling you beyond what any human agency could possibly be expected to resist. Poor fellow.

by intended2 hours ago|

parent|

[-]

Individual responsibility != behavior at scale.

I mean, If what I said affected your world view to the point that you have to respond the way you did, I am not sure what can be said to make it better for you.

This is the field of my work, so I know with certainty the point I am making.

My response to the situation was to learn and understand it so that it can be made better for normal people. So that they have an actual fair chance.

I assume you have the ability to acknowledge the difference between a single individual’s choice at one moment, and the choices of that individual at different times of the day.

Firms don’t bet on a single human making a reasonable choice. The bet that given enough humans, enough will be in the right circumstances to make the choices that benefit the firm.

Even individual agency shifts at different times, which is why food ads play at specific time slots.

No one is an island.