I still maintain my point that it isn't harmless to blindly address benign anomalies. Every medical procedure carries risk.
replyYour point doesn’t really make a lot of sense. Even with ChatGPT existing and making 90% bad calls, a doctor isn’t likely to just “blindly” be cutting out anomalies.
replyAs opposed to what OP said?
replyYour original comment seemed to imply that if ChatGPT had existed, maybe they’d have had ten benign things removed. But that’s not how it works.
replyConversely, ChatGPT can help avoid false negatives.
Obviously, error rate of ChatGPT should be measured by comparing to human diagnoses and when it plateaus, we should investigate a possibility that the number is driven mostly by human errors.
reply