The author declares that it is fully written by AI using a few prompts. So, not surprising that the whole article is so weak at the core.
replyOut of curiosity, where did he say that? FWIW I ran the first half through Pangram (truncated to use free credits) and it said 73% AI, evenly interspersed. (I have no idea how much truncation breaks their algorithm.)
replyI'm curious myself, in fact I was kind of relieved to read a long, well written article and just thought it felt human. I hope I'm right
reply