Hacker News
new
past
comments
ask
show
jobs
points
by
sudahtigabulan
7 hours ago
|
comments
by
a96
2 hours ago
|
next
[-]
Heh, I remember that and personally answering no when he complained about my paren formatting. I miss that channel.
reply
by
weknowbetter
6 hours ago
|
prev
|
next
[-]
This drives me nuts. I love LISP but refuse to pretend writing `)))))))` is reasonable.
reply
by
corroclaro
45 minutes ago
|
parent
|
next
[-]
My editor (emacs) shows how I close the scopes and it is easy enough. I'm not sure why writing
) ) ) ) )
would be so much better.
reply
by
uncletaco
6 hours ago
|
parent
|
prev
|
next
[-]
Why are you writing ')))))' instead of your closing parenthesis being autogenerated. Sounds like a recipe for failure.
reply
by
bitwize
49 minutes ago
|
parent
|
[-]
The 2026 version is: Why are you writing Lisp instead of your code being autogenerated. Sounds like a recipe for failure.
reply
by
greenbit
6 hours ago
|
parent
|
prev
|
next
[-]
))))))) isn't so bad, but )))))))) is just getting ridiculous. You have to draw the line
somewhere
reply
by
isr
6 hours ago
|
parent
|
prev
|
[-]
picolisp has an interesting solution to this. A single ']' will close all open )'s for that block of code
reply
by
packetlost
4 hours ago
|
parent
|
[-]
That has to be a nightmare for parsers lol
reply
by
ashkankiani
1 hours ago
|
parent
|
[-]
not really. it's just pop all of the stack and return to depth 0. you can still detect imbalanced parens, but i'm not sure how it affects the provenance question of where a missing one would point out in errors.
reply
by
andsoitis
6 hours ago
|
prev
|
next
[-]
[flagged]
reply
by
hujun236
6 hours ago
|
prev
|
[-]
[flagged]
reply