In practice, in Ukraine distributed solar power has been an increasingly important source of resilience in their power supply system.

There are legit reasons to push back against “solar and batteries everywhere” but I find it hard to credit resilience in a conflict situation as one of them.

I think I'd rather a solar panel array be bombed than a nuclear power plant.

Solar has the advantage that it can be widely distributed on buildings rather than in just a few centralized locations.

I don't see how anything would be more resilient than solar.