for anyone interested, here's a writeup of the DDoS story: https://web.archive.org/web/20260203073744/https://gyrovague...
replyWeren't they also caught modifying their "archived" content?
replyThat's been my nagging fear about them too. Obviously it's not an option they'd want to exercise frequently, but it could be devastating to individual targets.
reply(ofc this is a risk with the Wayback Machine, who also has a policy for honoring takedown request. But the Internet Archive's board and executives are known people with reputations)
On modifying bits, see perhaps this comment from a discussion ~8 months ago:
reply* https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47092006#47100204
* https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/02/wikipedia-bans-a...
Hm, someone in the first thread mentioned a Reddit cofounder did something like this too
replyYes, and archiving as a practice became popular when people noticed that media sites were beginning to edit or delete articles without listing a correction, sometimes after the story had already circulated widely. Previously, editors would usually make a note of such things.
reply(This is why archives that bypass paywalls are particularly important. I wish we had more options here.)
You keep using it as normal and if it tells you to copy and paste commands into your terminal you DO NOT do it?
replytbh yeah, this isn't my first time visiting a sketchy website and won't be my last
reply> investigative journalist
replyI think there is a confusion of blogger with a registered journalist, who must follow journalist's (ethic) rules.