Other sources say that what was publicly released as Argon was already the second version named Barium internally. So there was a separate internal Argon and public Argon was Barium. Not confusing at all for them!
https://www.reddit.com/r/GeminiAI/comments/1x292ly/a_new_che...
replyThe internal joke was that we're even scaling the off-by-one errors; Gemini 4 was not the fourth major model version.
replyStill better than Anthropic. If I create someday doomsday device, its turn off code will be to sort Anthropic models by strength given only their names, without access to the internet.
replyBefore Mythos/Fable they were simply size-ordered. A Haiku is a small poem of 3 lines, a Sonnet has 14 lines and an Opus is a larger work.
replyI suppose a Fable is seen as larger. But some of them can be quite short, and not generally considered poetry.
I found Anthropic to be pretty intuitive.
replyClearly, Google has already fired their marketing department and Gemini sucks at this job.
replyMaybe it thought the names are clear and intuitive (for an LLM perhaps).
Alphabetically sorting chemical elements sounds like something _only_ a marketing department could think of.
replyLiterally. If only elements came already presorted by some kind of a key already...
replyHmm..they did come up with Bard.
replyThis naming strategy is bizarre.
replyThere are no good elements for D; Dysprosium is the only one, and it's a mouthful. There are no good elements for E; Europium is the only one and would seem political. Is Fluorine their next release? (And then Gallium or Gadolinium?)
After Carbon, they should just update to Gemini 4.1 or 4.5 or whatever, and drop the random unrelated elements.
I don't think calling a model europium will be seen as political if it is a clear line of alphabetical animals, but who knows what the fine president can cook up
replyDeuterium?
replydeleted
reply