If things were implemented that way, you would see vastly more complaints about overeager refusals. For at least some deployments, the safety classifiers are based on internal LLM activations, so the input does get processed by the model.
replyA person still had to think about suicide and self-mutilation to make this anti-LLM script, though.
replyI'm not sure what the point being made is. No one is forcing anyone to come up with anti-LLM scripts...?
replyThe point is that something like this exists, or had to have existed. What lengths a person took to prevent de-obfuscation of code. The commenter above is saying it's sickening that a LLM has to "think" about this in order to not analyze the code, and I think it's equally sickening that, if someone wants to achieve said goal, they must think about stuff like that
replyAre you sure?
reply