Unless 100% of people vote it doesnt count as voting?
replyPeople who don't vote don't oppose the winner.
replyAny idea is worth entertaining, to avoid the realization the purity spiraling ideology is just as reviled by 90 % of the people as is racism.
replyI think my idea for this is that a candidate doesn’t win the election unless they get more than 50% of all eligible votes, not 50% of the votes cast. If there is no clear winner the seat is vacant, but a new election is scheduled for two weeks later. Districts and states that don’t care to vote simply don’t get a say.
replyThe New England Patriots lost the 2026 Superbowl, and that list of losers includes all the second and third stringers who didn't play.
replydeleted
replyBecause people in safe demographics (non minority, no care about reproductive rights) love to broadcast 'both sides are the same'.
reply[flagged]
replyIt was more like Obama was so cool and had so much panache he won despite having an extremely incompetent team...and then both he and his team believed he won because of them and proceeded to self-sabotage the DNC from within.
replyTo be clear, I'm not excusing him. I think he was very cool indeed but ultimately a weak president that lacked in leadership before and after his term
>NoidFonsense.
replyThis is a dogwhistling incel username.
What do you think makes a person left-wing or left-leaning?
replyoh yeah? which attitudes do you take issue with?
replyFeels like you're trying to bait them instead of engaging in good faith.
reply