They did, I just didn't include it: $0.07 cached input / M
replySo 10x-20x vs Deepseek v4.1 Flash and I don't have on hand how efficient Mistral is regarding cache hits, etc.
On the other hand, could be some decent competition lowering pricing if the models general performance warrants broad hosting.
I know Claude Code now has /usage to see cache hit rate. I usually have >97% also.
reply[flagged]
replyLook at the Intelligence Index vs. Cost per Task. Mistral 4 is not competitive. https://artificialanalysis.ai/#intelligence-efficiency-tabs
replyIrregardless of wether or not Mistral Large 4 is competitive or not, I do not trust the AA numbers anymore, for various reasons. Them changing their numbers around so much recently brings the entire validity of this in question, not to mention if such a combined number is even important at all. The combined "intelligence" score of AA includes areas I do not care about or need at all.
replyAgree. They had just fiddled with the formula a few weeks prior to this, too. There seems to be an effort to get a certain result from the model rankings.
replydeleted
replyAt this point, are you using Deepseek flash 4.1 or is somebody else paying for your model usage unconstrained or are you a moron?
reply