upvote
The other catch is that those displays are built for heavy duty use, not for picture quality, and as such aren’t going to look as good as even a budget consumer OLED TV.
reply
Disagree. They look more than fine, much better than the budget TV with their fake saturation turned to 11 out of the box. If you think that looks good you might have gotten used to it.
reply
Post specs, in my research these types of displays universally prioritise brightness over all other specs.
reply
https://solutions.lg.com/us/hospitality-tvs/lg-55am960h0ud

Hotel TVs, same panels as consumer models with different supporting hardware and stock calibrations. These are actually dimmer than the consumer models to increase panel longevity.

They tend to lack gaming features like high/variable refresh rate but they're more functional as normal TVs than digital signage displays.

They have similar OSes as the consumer models and can run the same apps but don't have ads unless the operator wants them to and can be centrally managed, support internal IPTV networks, etc.

reply
The ones the serve menus and the ones that serve eye-level video ads are definitely also built for picture quality. Still IPS for the most part, but uniformity and colour calibration can be movie-worthy
reply
Not a problem, coming from a 1080p unit haha
reply
Are you sure those displays have everything needed for a smooth TV experience? Do they have eARC to connect a sound bar, and stuff like that? Modern TVs are also quite good at upscaling 1080/720p content, screens often aren't.

(I don't care about integrated speakers though)

reply
deleted
reply
1080 (even 720 really) is absolutely fine at normal viewing distances for most streaming content.

If you're a videophile you might care. Most people would not notice.

reply
The pattern of "is feature X supported?" being responded to by "don't worry you don't need it" is so common in tech/OSS forums, and so awful.
reply
it's funny, I used to think and care about this (or thought I did) back when 1080 was the common thing and 4k was new and exotic, but now I really don't care.

I think what changed was the realisation that even with 4k hardware in theory, what you're actually seeing is so variable based on bandwidth and different services' support for different shows you basically don't know anyway and thus it doesn't really make much sense to care about it.

Besides which, you realise that things that are made to be more enjoyable on 4k, like where that would actually make a difference to how good it is, are probably not that much worth watching anyway outside of demos. Certainly it's not, for example, a factor on which you want to be choosing what series to watch.

reply
Exactly, streaming video is so compressed that 4k will just let you see all the compression artifacts more clearly.
reply
Or jailbreak/defang the consumer TVs to have privacy anyway, and teach others how, and screw over the entire profit model of the surveillance-subsidized TVs to force things to be sold at a real cost.
reply
>Or jailbreak/defang the consumer TVs to have privacy anyway

And how will my 50 year old mom and 70 year old grandpa know how to do that? "Hey Claude scan the wifi for a LG TV, hack it, root it and give me the keys to install what I want, then lock out LG from access it?"

As always, the sane fix is in government legislation and enforcement of privacy regulations. But this isn't happening since knowledge of smart device spyware across politicians and the voting population is small and governments want to use that data dragnet that smart devices enable for their own means.

reply
"Hey Claude...."

Well, why not?

reply
"your account has been terminated for violations of our T&Cs"
reply
I have bad news for you. Those commercial TV-s also phone home if connected to the internet. For software updates, analytics regarding digital signage usage etc.

For a long time they haven't been just dumb displays. They also run Tizen or WebOS for digital signage applications.

reply
> that's the cost of turning a profit on screens with no spyware and ads.

I don't think that the cost of TVs has gone down when they added spyware and ads.

You could say that that's the cost of turning less profits, rather, and I suspect that TV manufacturers keep the costs of normal displays high just to discourage their purchase by normal people.

reply