Also newer archs (riscv) don't support certain syscalls (open, fork) they are still functions you can call under your standard musl,glibc but they inernally call openat, clone.
replyI see, but why were they numbered differently? Why not use the same numbers?
replyAs far as I know, the numbers were assigned independently by each port's developers in the 90s as they added calls in their own order. Then it became a frozen ABI nobody could ever renumber, and couldn't have been identical anyway since arches need different syscall variants for things like 32bit vs 64bit types
reply