upvote
Arguing that LLMs spontaneously evolve new capabilities outside of their training set (being able to naturally interpret weights and manipulate them to change their function) is a completely different proposition from being able to pattern-match Pac Man really fast from a pseudo-graphical representation (which is what they actually do here).

It's like ChatGPT coming up with a brand new brownie recipe that's surprisingly good vs. coming up with a working design for a cold fusion reactor.

Yeah the brownie is cool, but it's not that cool.

reply
If faster intelligence was “groundbreaking” we would still be worshipping pocket calculators.
reply
If by "pocket calculator" you mean linear algebra machines that do our work, then yes, we are doing that.
reply
I’m personally a huge fan of viewing LLMs as linear algebra machines. They seem a lot less fascinating when you do that.
reply
What's an alternative to the more complete, correct description, "Linear algebra machines that can learn nonlinear functions?"

Witchcraft?

reply
AGI
reply
I'm upping my P(doom)...
reply
deleted
reply