upvote
Still doesn’t mean you can’t look at those people as foolish, no different than if they handed a cigarette to their teen or let their kid get obese.
reply
I think both of those are overtly addictive, pointless, and negligent examples. What about encouraging them to get their driver's license, try alcohol or weed, or skateboard? What about trying to isolate them from the world on the deep suburbs?

I think it's more destructive to control and remove your child from the possibility of risk at the cost of preventing them from learning to navigate the world with the information at hand to do so in way they can manage.

reply
Football was most definitely a net-negative for my life. All I learned is how to be homophobic, how to be hateful, and how to get hurt.

There is something to be said about the socialization of sports. But there is such a thing as negative socialization, regression even. I would say football consistently has one of the most toxic cultures of any sport. It’s improving, very slowly. But there’s more to gain than just lower head injury risk by switching to a different sport.

reply
> Football was most definitely a net-negative for my life. All I learned is how to be homophobic, how to be hateful, and how to get hurt.

I played football and yet never drink, have never done drugs, am not and was never homophobic, never got into trouble etc.

Would I let a kid play football now, with all the knowledge of CTE? No. I absolutely even worry about it for myself. But it's a bit odd, to me, to say "football made me a bad person".

reply
I mean I’ve of course unlearned the regressive social circumstances of football, nor is it unique to football. It’s fairly common in many male-dominated spaces, particularly ones which tend to cater to toxic ideals of masculinity or, as it is sometimes euphemized, comradery.

I think basically all people who were socialized male have had these experiences at one point or another, whether it be in football, in class, in the military, at sleepovers, in the locker room.

My point is more so that football has a particular “culture”, or it did when I was a kid. And that culture was not necessarily socially productive at a young and impressionable age. When we see certain behaviors in particularly young men, we have to wonder where they come from, and what we are doing to cultivate that.

reply
There's a dozen alternative sports they can play with far lower injury rates.

Encouraging them to get a drivers license is fine (run cross-country), but getting them a driver's license and buying your 16-year old a sports car with bald tires and no seatbelts (football) is negligent.

reply
I think it's far more destructive to allow a child to play a sport that basically guarantees that they'll end up with massive brain damage.

If cars, alcohol or weed caused 75%+ of the people who used them to have massive brain damage then it'd be unreasonable to allow people to use those too.

reply
"Preventing them from learning to navigate the world"? We're talking about football.
reply
"I xed and I was fine," is pretty much it. Why beat your kids? Why let them go into large amounts of debt for college? Why circumcise your boys? No real thought of if circumstances have changed or if the original assumptions/data were flawed.
reply
CTE is not nebulous and uncertain. If it were not for "tradition", it would be considered child abuse to let them repeatedly slam their brains into their skulls.
reply
It absolutely is when we're talking about humans evaluating risk in the context of an important part of their culture. The consequences come decades later and are far from certain.
reply