upvote
That does very little to diminish the incredibly suspicious nature of having the family members of a notoriously corrupt president on the board of a dubiously-legal-at-best company whose product is a platform for betting on major world events.
reply
I know those two are different things, but both have the same problem here. What point are you making?
reply
There’s no difference because the point isn’t to take advice. The position is an excuse to award shares.
reply
Why do they need an excuse to award shares? The fund he is part of has apparently invested over $500m in Polymarket.
reply
Ok so he's a paid advisor and heavily invested in it.
reply