I think so.

Autonomous or human-directed AI agents submit their work to a public repository.

Then the scientific community draws from this pool of results, identifies the important ones, and starts working on adding the results to the greater body of scientific knowledge. This work of interpretation, synthesis and question formation should be recognised and rewarded in peer-reviewed academic journals.

I wrote a blog here talking about it: https://colinocallaghan.com/posts/answers-are-getting-cheape...

  Knowing that something is true or false

Assuming you can trust it

Maybe but it might also be useless. Knowing a very large number is the product of two very large primes doesn’t at all help the reader to understand factorization, for example.