I mean, LLMs themselves come from exactly this phenomena. They are a product of finding a technology that scales and going with that no matter what. And parts of this will hit a wall and have to retrench, current players may implode but the genie isn't going back into its bottle so disruption within disruption will continue.
Maybe? I’m not 100% on this one.
Not trying to be a downer, but it could become a mixed bag is all I’m saying.
I don't see sufficient evidence that this is not going to be a perpetual race between people/AIs fixing existing software and more advanced and powerful next generation AIs finding new vulnerabilities and exploits.
I know how to ride a bike.
Does your chatbot?
Let us skip the strawman.
The point is knowledge not ability.
> not a scientific claim
Ain't that the truth.
> it's a colloquial exaggeration
Agreed.