upvote

points

by FireBeyond13 hours ago |
comments
upvoteby 101110013 hours ago|
next
[-]
> The same junior flunkies who would do things like go to government agencies, create administrative accounts, which would then, often with minutes, be seen connecting from Russia and Eastern Europe with the correct credentials.

They are young and think they are very smart. What could go wrong?

reply
upvoteby brador2 hours ago|
parent|
[-]
For anyone new, the above are talking about trump and Elons DOGE gov department.
reply
upvoteby trismus12 hours ago|
prev|
[-]
Source?
reply
upvoteby adzm12 hours ago|
parent|
next
[-]
> Daniel J. Berulis, a cybersecurity architect with the NLRB, filed a whistleblower complaint alleging that within 15 minutes of DOGE team members creating new user credentials and demanding administrative access, multiple login attempts using those exact credentials originated from a Russian IP address

https://www.npr.org/2025/04/15/nx-s1-5355896/doge-nlrb-elon-...

reply
upvoteby Terr_12 hours ago|
parent|
prev|
[-]
Oh come on, search-engines have gone downhill, but not that far downhill! You already know it involves "DOGE" and "Russia" and "credentials", that ought to be enough:

> Berulis alleged in the affidavit that there attempted logins to NLRB systems from an IP address in Russia in the days after DOGE accessed the systems. He told Reuters Tuesday that the attempted logins apparently included correct username and password combinations but were rejected by location-related conditional access policies.

* https://www.reuters.com/technology/cybersecurity/whistleblow...

* https://www.npr.org/2025/04/15/nx-s1-5355896/doge-nlrb-elon-...

reply
upvoteby trismus10 hours ago|
parent|
next
[-]
I could have this entire conversation with ai too.
reply
upvoteby lukan8 hours ago|
parent|
[-]
You literally asked for a source and when provide by a human it was not enough? Maybe you should rather engage with AI completely then?
reply
upvoteby trismus7 hours ago|
parent|
[-]
It was enough and I appreciated it with the context, and conversation ensued. Not sure why I was scolded for doing so, that's what I meant by being able to have the conversation with AI - this whole interaction is defunct if we're going by the logic that it could be had another way.. I didn't want to go research it myself, I wanted to know where my peers are sourcing this novel-to-me information from.
reply
upvoteby what11 hours ago|
parent|
prev|
[-]
> often

You have one alleged example.

reply
upvoteby Terr_10 hours ago|
parent|
[-]
> You have one alleged example.

That sounds like being deliberately obtuse and arguing in bad-faith. Are you going to "nuh uh" all the journalists and lawyers until you are personally given raw TCP dumps?

Behold, from the sworn affidavit of the DevSecOps guy with the top-secret clearance, as included in a whistleblower disclosure to Congress [0]:

> There were more than 20 such attempts, and what is particularly concerning is that many of these login attempts occurred within 15 minutes of the accounts being created by DOGE engineers.

So there it is, now don't go moving the goalposts.

[0] https://whistlebloweraid.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/2025...

reply