undefined

points

[-]

What is connected when my LLM, extrapolating from a vague prompt about a cool liquid effect, takes this method and reproduces it without acknowledging the original author? Certainly not me and the author.

Using connectedness and unity to defend the fragmentation of the social bond is ironic, to say the least.

by xpct4 hours ago|

prev|

[-]

Next time someone wants to make a spreading liquid effect, their LLM is more likely to know how to make it. They won't have to read this work when looking for references, won't get to know the person who thought of this and shared it with the world.

Surely it's at least understandable why the author could be feeling a bit sad about it?

by nomel4 hours ago|

parent|

[-]

If I made something for fun, for the public, for free, and it exploded into common use, I would be super happy that I made something useful. But, I also always license any software I write (outside of work) as public domain like.

by strogonoff2 hours ago|

parent|

[-]

We are social creatures, and wanting to impress fellow beings is part of the reason why we do original things.

When you made something public domain pre-LLMs, you generally could expect people to give kudos to you.

With LLMs, if you make something public and an LLM gobbles it up, not only you get zero credit but you also can’t convincingly claim to have come up with it (since anyone can just assume you used an LLM), and neither can anyone else (even if they have come up with it fully independently).

If you don’t seek any recognition for your original work, then that’s fine, but I suspect you might be in a minority.

by doublerabbit37 minutes ago|

prev|

[-]

It's okay to cherish a knack you've come across and it is sad to hand it off. It is special when you produce something traditional.

Show some empathy, the world is far from connected and united.