upvote
If you did it right it was like having a Mac except you had better specs and it was more customisable while costing much less to build.

For others it was just about the money. If you needed to run Mac software e.g. Xcode but didn't want to have to buy a Mac for that reason alone it was much cheaper to do a bit of tinkering to get OSX working on the hardware they already had.

When I first build my Hackintosh it took less effort than installing Linux on some of the other computers I had.

reply
Exactly this. There was a point in the late 2000's / early 2010's where Mac's were very overpriced relative to the hardware they were selling.

I built two Hackintoshes in those years, and they were rock solid. You did have to pay attention to the hardware you were buying (mostly motherboard and GPU), but if you got that right, they worked really well.

reply
I had the same eperience. I built an “iMac” on top of all-in-one PC. Was rock solid.
reply
Usually the way is to favour the competition instead, all those arguments are known to me.

Maybe it helps that in my part of the globe Apple was largely irrelevant until they manage to survive bankruptcy with the iPod, and iMacs.

reply
Getting to play around with new GPUs was one of the things that kept me excited.
reply
I wanted a Mac that they wouldn't sell me. That's why.
reply
Hence why we buy stuff from the competition instead.
reply
Because I was broke

I got my current job thanks to having one. I probably wouldn't have a tech career without hackintoshes being a thing.

reply
In my part of the globe, ignoring iOS development, any computer does the job.

So in such case I would have opted out for a cheap PC built of parts running some Linux distro, or Windows, which has most audio and design tooling as OS X has.

reply
Any computer doesn’t do the job if your job is dependent on the ecosystem.
reply
So iOS development then.
reply
[dead]
reply
For the lulz? We are on "Hacker" News after all.
reply