I imagine I’d learn a fair bit about how to go about vibe-coding developer tools by implementing this, so it hardly seems pointless? It seems like an interesting exercise.
replyYep, and the code is an eyesore to look at. Almost no logical separation of code blocks (everything mashed-up together) I was really expecting LLM to annotate every line of code with (useless) comments, considering many vibecoded js projects are like that.
replyEither my C skills are getting rusty and that is how a C codebase normally looks like, or LLM was trained on some suspicious codebases.
I checked a few source files at random and it looked fine to me overall. It's broken down into small-to-medium sized functions, contrary to what you suggest. If your issue is just the size of the individual source files, then you can find much larger in non-vibe-coded C projects like QuickJS.
replyNo you're right, this code is terrible. Running a linter like clang-tidy would surface many issues. Not sure why the LLM didn't think of ever doing that.
reply