If the thing is not worth writing by yourself, then it is probably not worth of reading by any humans.
reply[flagged]
replyI've seen you posting about "stoichastic human-parrots" in multiple threads now, so I think you deserve to know it's spelled "stochastic."
replyHaha thanks! Now to retrain my auto-correct.
replyothers have said: “Don’t be a meat proxy”
replyso your question is “What’s it like to be a meat proxy?” which might be taken as trolling
I think solyin is trying to imply that the anti-AI sentiment is as formulaic as any hopped-up markov chain. So perhaps a better way of rephrasing their question is "What's it like to be meat?"
replydon't edit Ai garbage - make Ai your editor that points out mistakes instead
replyI assume here you mean "editor" in the traditional sense of someone who draws red lines on your printed draft, rather than a tool you use to make the changes directly... ?
replyDon’t use LLMs.
replyI'll do you one better, don't use computers.
replyComputers were a mistake tbh.
replyExactly. We can all agree the LLM should use computers for us.
replyNo editing required.
/s because humans probably need it.
Why would you "remember" to edit when you explicitly resorted to AI not to do any of that?
reply