upvote
A Little Snitch for Windows

(packethound.app)

Seems like tools like this get mentioned a lot lately. I think it's because there are more and more things the user allowed to leak out without the user knowing? (mostly through AI)
reply
Isn't this just ZoneAlarm?
reply
It reminds me more of the old Windows firewall/IPS/IDS called Sygate. It was ahead of its time. I think Zonealarm came after since that is what I replaced it with after Symantec(?) bought Sygate and rolled the best functions of Sygate into their Professional firewall for a premium price. Sygate was free or you could buy a permanent license for a one-time fee. It was the best personal protection products available for pcs running Windows up to WinXP.

I had also tried a different firewall/privacy tool from a company in Canada I think called ZeroKnowledge. That was a great product that also allowed you fine-grained access to and control of all connections to/from your Windows pc. They had a product available for a short time but shut down suddenly. I think I read that they were bought out by another firewall company but can't remember which one. They may have been rolled into the Blackberry software line.

Both of these were available in the 90's lead-up to the dot com bust if I remember right. Sygate became obsolete when support ended around the time WinXP faded. ZeroKnowledge disappeared much earlier. I may have old executables and installers somewhere on antique backups.

reply
Is zonealarm still alive?

Portmaster has been filling this role for me for the last couple years.

reply
Windows firewall control
reply
This only prompts you after the connection has already been rejected, instead of holding it for approval like Little Snitch and Portmaster -- but I did have WFC installed on my Windows machines anyway, it's still useful.
reply
I used Portmaster too until they started locking existing features behind paid subscription. And generally just pushing towards microtransactions in general. I vastly prefer buy once or buy per major version.
reply
Personally I used Kerio Personal Firewall. I remember it being very good and while I didn't care about outbound connections much back then, I'm pretty sure it had a similar feature it was just off by default
reply
It's a tvery similar concept and presentation
reply
or perhaps BlackICE
reply
Wow haven't read that name since around 2000, gave me a weird feeling in my brain.

Here's another one: F.O.S.I.

reply
With all the reverse engineering out there going on now, I really hope someone does the REA with BlackICE. I miss that software so much. If it works native and is high quality with the simplistic GUI of ZoneAlarm, I would be so happy.
reply
Good, older alternative (seems to be not this user friendly) is Malwarebytes Window Firewall Control.
reply
Just tried this and it has a learning mode which is what I was looking for.

Thank you for the recommendation.

reply
Came here to see how many others there were. This is only way I can actually feel like I'm in control of using modern OS. Everything is telemetry this and analytics that.
reply
Windows Firewall Control by binisoft https://binisoft.org/wfc is the real Little Snitch for Windows
reply
Portmaster is my go-to

Edit: and glasswire although portmaster is my favorite

reply
Glasswire royally f*cked all the goodwill by going subscription-only.

Such unadulterated greed, it was painful to watch as it unfolded.

reply
Another alternative is Simplewall: https://github.com/henrypp/simplewall
reply
Which I use for years, and just because of lack of a better alternative (minimal, OSS) I actually quite "hate" it.:

It has no rules, like "Allow a file with THIS name on THAT path", the biggest complain of every simplewall user is its biggest flaw and annoyance: It asks you a million times to allow or deny the "same" app, after its checksum changed. So all the Windows apps that auto update always pop up again and again.

A coding agent autonomously compiling and testing an exe with network access is impossible. I have to turn off simplewall, because it would constantly block the executable after recompilation.

reply
I'm a simplewall user and what you describing is not my biggest flaw or annoyance - I simply don't upgrade windows (why would calculator need updates??) and after clicking few denies, its get very quiet. Been this way for 2 years now on Win 11.
reply
Personally I like getting the security updates even if I have a firewall.

Even among simplewall users I bet the vast majority install OS updates regularly.

reply
I also easily recommend this one. And OpenSnitch on linux seems to be doing the same job, though the interface can be less friendly.
reply
Simplewall is quite terrible, IMO. They still haven't fixed the painfully slow fuzzy search functionality for firewall rules.
reply
deleted
reply
People are conjuring up all kinds of apps slapped together by LLMs and actually have the gal to ask money for them?!
reply
It’s free tho
reply
They removed the "Pricing" menu item from the website.
reply
Might as well make some money while you can.
reply
So now we use AI for coding we can't sell any apps anymore?

Like this guy pushed a button and everything just happened?

What does it matter if it's mostly coded by an LLM. If someone skilled guided an LLM to build an app that does something meaningful and useful why shouldn't they be able to sell it or accept donations?

reply
If there's no real skill involved and anyone could've built it then it's essentially worthless. Save for the cost of the tokens used perhaps.
reply
I mean—I can think of a whole lot of people whose jobs I could do, but who I’m happy to pay a little to avoid having to deal with it myself.

It doesn’t take particularly sophisticated skill to load up your garbage and drive it to the landfill—and, frankly, it’s kind of fun every once in a while—but I certainly wouldn’t call municipal trash service worthless…

I’m reminded of that old saw about contemporary art: “That?! I could have done that!” / “Yeah, but you didn’t…”

reply
I'd rather not use a security tool which is 100% vibeslop with a 100% vibeslop website.
reply
Cool.

It would be better if it suggested the consequences of stopping programs from phoning home, like will this program say the license check failed after 2 weeks, or will it keep working.

reply
How is this better and more comprehensive than Fort Firewall? https://github.com/tnodir/fort
reply
I prefer this one as well.
reply
https://github.com/tnodir/fort/wiki/HVCI

packethound can be managed via group policy

packethound has that air of AI slop sophistication

reply
I've been working on my own version of this for a little over a year. Sigh.
reply
May I see it?
reply
I'm looking for somewhere to put it anonymously, don't want to doxx myself.
reply
many options for this? unless you are ultra-concerned with anyone knowing who you are.
reply
I'm not that special. Apologize for the LLM cruft, I had Fable spin through to try and clean it up. If it's broken, oh well.

https://codeberg.org/Avicebron/Sereno

reply
I beg you. At the very least, please, write your own headers. I don't even need you to write the whole copy on the page, but please, don't make us read that claudease slop. This makes the app you advertise look like the lowest of efforts, no matter what it is.

"Know which apps are calling home." "Every connection, your call"

reply
Or better yet, make the aite itself open-source so people can contribute better writing.
reply
I learnt recently these are called "staccato sentences" https://x.com/michael_chomsky/status/2107235505620521274. Update your agents.md
reply
But then how would you know that the app is the lowest of efforts if the copy is better written?
reply
> Most firewalls only watch what comes in

Uh, no they don't. I haven't used a firewall in 20 years that hasn't had both inbound and outbound monitoring lol.

reply
slop
reply
[dead]
reply