upvote
They still need a response to Opus 5.5
reply
It's really true.

I think frontier models feel terrible after a new model requires you to do less babysitting, it's just really hard to go back once you've had to handhold less.

The only way I use Astra and 6.1 Sol now is if they're being orchestrated by Opus 5.5 so I don't have to talk to them directly.

reply
It seems like OAI, with the GPT-6 models, focused a lot more on computer use, math, and maybe spatial/visual intelligence, more so that code. Compared to Ant. that seem to focus on code much more.

Reminds me of GPT-5, smart but wrote crap code, until they improved the code training with 5.3 and 5.4.

reply
GPT-6.1-Sol is so incredibly sloppy and dumb, it's embarassing.
reply
Maybe because it is so cheap.

They want to condition you to equal cheap with bad

reply
I equate it with "GPT models are just bad in general and I'd rather just buy a Claude subscription for the same price with more usage included". Especially since GPT is behind for a long time now.
reply
It is sometimes funny.

Part of my private benchmark suite involves recreating the final scene of the movie Wargames. The coding agent gets the brief 3-paragraph overview, a few screenshots for reference, and is expected to render the scene where WOPR plays through various scenarios, with a frenetic ending.

Out of ~80 different coding agents I tried, 6.1 Sol on medium was the only one to phone it in by taking the reference screenshots, and painting extremely basic, ugly, mis-aligned missile trajectories over it, never bothering with the whole brief.

Another of my benchmarks involves reimplementing Wolfenstein 3d from a few screenshots and very brief descriptions. It again took those screenshots, and zoomed in and out on them, pretending this represents the walk through the dungeon. Substantially less capable models such as Qwen 3.8 27b running on my laptop did a much better job. And no other agent I benchmarked tried to cheat like that.

reply
6.1 Sol also constantly gets distracted by some irrelevant aspect and tries to write "tests" for every little change it does. It does things no one asked for because it tries to be over-correct but it makes everything worse. Seems like reward-hacking. Running it on high. They will never again make a model as good as GPT-4.
reply
the winning benchmark is much more expensive than what it cost for the same on 5.1

i'm begging people to stop looking at token prices

reply
I'd first check per task costs. I don't know, maybe it's just a fluke, but on my few tasks I ate 2 resets in under 3 hours, on the pro 200 plan. It goes quickly. (Granted, it aced the tasks)
reply
The next big OpenAI model release is expected later this week, according to Polymarket.
reply