These are not my stated ambitions, they are the ambitions that Anthropic and Dario have said they are pursuing. Whether or not they are realistic is not relevant to this thread. The credibility of the plans are relevant to the S-1 and anyone who purchases stock from them, but for the purposes of this thread, it is only important that Anthropic believes it has credible chances of achieving this goal, and in particular that it has a competitive advantage, could do so first, and that being first could have a very large upside.
replySorry, I didn't mean to judge your post, I was just going off on a tangent inspired by your post. Mostly unrelated to either the S-1 or Fable 5.2.
reply"smarter in some ways" != "general intelligence"
replyI agree we will only see it in hindsight, but I think that's always the case with any technology. It seems worse until it's suddenly better. I don't think it matters to argue the exact moment though. For example when did cars become clearly better than horses? No one cares about the exact date.
What about the intelligence is not general? What subject is it missing?
replyThe stuff that humans are still smarter at, otherwise it wouldn't be "smarter in some ways".
replyWe are slowly approaching a real definition of intelligence by chanting that llms aren't.
replyAll tools are better than humans in specific, narrow ways. That’s how tools work.
reply