upvote
> You don't seem to have understood my comment very well.

> But I don't know.

Yes, I understood your comment perfectly. You literally don't know if any of it's findings are even helpful or not. So what are people supposed to take away from that?

reply
You said, "Your first impression is that you have no clue if any of its findings actually mean anything because you can't even understand them [...]".

I do in fact understand the findings, as I already clarified in the comment you just clicked "reply" on, and nothing in my original comment suggests that I don't, so you evidently misread it. There's no shame in admitting that. People make mistakes all the time. The shame is in refusing to correct them.

I'll have firmer information once the model has been out for more than 24 hours. But I think my experience report is already firm enough to be useful. I guess the other 8 people who upvoted it think so too. It's okay with me if it isn't useful to you. No information is useful to everyone.

reply
Understanding findings in this context would require that you actually know whether they are true or false, not just that you know what the words mean.

Like you said, "It could be hallucinating!" Lol.

reply
You seem to be attempting to redefine the word "understand" so that it makes your false statement true. You should be ashamed of yourself.
reply
[flagged]
reply