upvote
> …without lining Musk pockets even more.

I just can’t fathom the logic here. You say that you don’t want to line Musk’s pockets, but seizing SpaceX/Starlink would cost a trillion dollars or more and all of that money would go to Elon Musk! The government would have to issue a trillion dollars of bonds, agreeing to pay interest on them for decades, and then hand all of the money over to Elon Musk who then doesn’t have to pay that interest.

You’re deluding yourself to think that it’s even feasible. And it’s also a bad idea just on general principles.

I agree that the breakup of AT&T was a mistake though.

reply
You’re conflating “buying” with “seizing.”
reply

    > You’re conflating “buying” with “seizing.”
in what fantasy land are you people living?

if a government just seizes a multi trillion corporation, that government has just signed its economic death warrant. no one will ever trust it again and everyone will start examining jumping ship options.

it will actually lose more economic value the very next day than the value of the corporation it seized. probably in just the bond market alone.

and this even ignores the court challenges that will follow and likely undo the action but not the damage.

reply