upvote
I don't see how the post displays blind faith. The author contacted the relevant authority in Mexico to ask if they already had a record of this village, and even after they said that they didn't, he was careful to hedge and not to claim that this was definitely an original discovery. He flagged the speculative part of the post as speculation, and as far as I can tell, the parts he was confident about have not been disputed.
reply
Doesn't matter, the title is out there, news outlets will omit this little detail. Even here the post is gaining in popularity even after the top comment has questioned its validity.
reply
The AI craze is quite possibly the most annoying hype cycle I’ve ever witnessed.
reply
deleted
reply
And what exactly would that rigorous check be?

You pull up the lidar scan and see that there actually IS what clearly appears to be a human-made structure.

And he did. And there is. And then he rigorously contacted government authorities and verified that it is not a registered site.

There are other problems at play. But this is not one of them.

reply
Then in this thread author said the site has already been published about. So he vibe verified it because further verification proved him wrong in the end.
reply
it feeds into the typical egotistical nerd fallacy of "im smart in X, that translates to be smart at almost everything else with lower effort".

I myself have to keep my stinking paws from some projects at work due to realizing that AI was making me believe I could shit taller than my ass.

It's like revenge of the nerds, but this time the other nerds outside the AI craze are the target instead of the typical bully.

reply