I appreciate you following up and admitting not being aware of the site having been previously found. It's great work, regardless, and shows promising results for future archeological discoveries. If anything, the site having been previously found encourages greater confidence that future findings aren't hallucinated.

> The agents missed it while going through the literature

Is this verifiable? I wonder given the recent publications regarding intentional deception that is ultimately opaque to end users.

it's definitely exciting enough. thanks for sharing.