upvote
Likey codes or building management wouldn't let them make the necessary modifications to safely install a Halon system
reply
Halon systems are banned, at the international and federal level, and have been since the 1990s; so, modern DCs don't and can't use them.
reply
There are lots of 'clean agent' fire suppression systems that are not actually "Halon". I suspect people still use it as a generic term.
reply
There's tons of substitutes, the ban on Halon wouldn't be why Jane St is using water.

Many people (like me) use "halon" when they are talking about general inert gas based fire suppression as there's not really a good short word for them otherwise.

reply
If those go off, they end up destroying hard drives (the spinning kind), due to the sound pressure....

So fire suppression and data centers don't mix too well

reply
Ahh... the Vax War (bit hard to search for it now... gotta search for the first line). VAXen, my children, just don't belong some places.

https://www.hack.org/~mc/texts/vaxen-joke.txt

Realizing that I'm spoiling some of it... but we're here, so some of it is inherently spoiled...

           The fire alarm klaxon went off and the siren warning
           of imminent halon gas release was screaming.  We
           started to panic but the data center manager shouted
           over the din, "Don't worry, the halon system failed
           its acceptance test last week. It's disabled and
           nothing will happen."
 
           He was half right, the primary halon system indeed
           failed to discharge. But the secondary halon system
           observed that the primary had conked and instantly
           did its duty, which was to deal with Dire Disasters.
           It had twice the capacity and six times the discharge
           rate.
reply
They don't have to blow that fast. It can be regulated.

But yes, I've seen low-O2 installations also. These have other issues though, like no protection when humans need to be in there for maintenance. And the need to be very very careful when reducing it again, making sure everyone is out. It happened to my colleague once that this went wrong and while it's not low enough that you'll die, he wasn't exactly feeling great for the next few hours.

reply
Yeah, like the infamous Nasdaq Nordic outage in 2018 due to errant fire suppression gas release.
reply
Other datacenters we built had them (which scared the shit out of me tbh). I don't remember why this one had to stay on sprinklers.
reply
Maybe because it was in a normal office building? The gas extinguishers might be too hazardous there
reply
Or CO2 but that's a life or death situation if there's any people still inside
reply
Halon is not exactly fun to breathe, either.
reply
Especially after it's been in contact with fire, the resulting products are even worse.

But it's only used in military and aviation these days anyway.

reply
Probably not safe to use on a floor that has people on it.
reply
We had it at work at a datacenter right beside offices and reception.

You just have to reinforce the ceiling panels and the windows so they don't get blown out, but it's not really an issue otherwise. It was all certified and regularly checked. Water is indeed a bit counterproductive as it's not really much better than fire for the equipment in there.

PS: Halon itself is of course gone but it's other less harmful gases these days.

What also happens is low-oxygen environments (they only raise the O2 when maintenance is being done).

reply
Just curious was this on a ground level building? Seems unsafe in a high rise because of fewer egress points.
reply
It was in a 3-level building. One DC was on the ground floor and one on the 3rd. But not exactly highrise no.
reply
deleted
reply