upvote
These days US has nowhere near enough soft power to do something like that.
reply
Agreed. And it would damage Nvidia if they went along with this.
reply
fall of nvidia is acceptable collateral damage, they are just hardware vendor. all their chips are made by TSMC anyways. And they can be replaced by OpenAI's inhouse chips or googles TPUs, made in the same TSMC factories.

no biggie if their valuation will deflate a bit just like Cisco did in 2000.

pure-software business like openai/ant, will be protected and their global market will be protected

reply
If anyone can make chips like Nvidia, why isn't another company doing it already? Anything can sound easy if you reduce it enough, but I really don't see how it is that easy in practice.
reply
its not easy, but google and amazon are doing that, openai is working on that, others will follow
reply
Indeed, If the CCP stays stable long enough they'll (as a country) succeed at it.

Not because they care about the rest of the world, they care about their own domestic market/sales though.

They successfully re-invented half of modern consumer tech inside China already, the the US closes a market, it hurts them for a few years then they close that gap.

For decades it's been "Yeah they closed the Gap on X but we have Y" then "Yeah they closed the gap on Y but we have Z" and Z starts to look pretty uncertain.

At a certain point you have to realise that with enough capital and people you can do the things that the other people with enough capital and people are doing, there isn't really any secret special "America has to be the tech leader" sauce, there wasn't when the British where the world leaders or when the Italians where or the Middle East and back through history.

Exceptionalism eventually kills your lead.

reply
They can't even stop one company from selling physical chips to China, yet somehow they're going to prevent anybody from running open models? I don't know, it doesn't seem likely to me.
reply
there will be divergence: US-aligned world (NATO+Korea+Japan and other vassal states) will bend over and agree to whatever regulation Department of Commerce/State is cooking to ban open weight (Chinese) models.

the rest of the world will be starved of GPUs and chipmaking equipment and chemical supplies for chip making

reply
I… don't think that will work now…

> US/NATO/US-aligned world

NATO really barely exists anymore as a consensus mechanism, it doesn't make that kind of policy or have that sort of policy influence, the "US-alignment" of the world has never been weaker, and the genie is really out of the bottle on the technology anyway.

reply
false, US is able to dictate its will to its vassals, because US controls the supply us chips for inference and software for LLM
reply
> (at least in US/NATO/US-aligned world)

Might have worked if they did it suddenly and all at once a decade ago.

I don't think anyone thinking that is possible has thoroughly understood how much soft power the US has lost in the last decade.

reply
US still has hard power, what do you think Canada or Denmark can do against US's will ?

invoke Nato article 5? or loudly complain to see a manager?

reply
>Open models will be banned at the GPU level.

Is this actually technically possible?

reply
maybe, unless you have a torrent client
reply
I don't see how this can happen, though. There are a lot of GPUs out there and open models have already been downloaded millions of times. (IIRC Deepseek v4.1 Flash has been downloaded nearly 2M times just on HuggingFace, just over the past month.) The NATO world already relies quite heavily on open models, in many cases served by Mistral and other local providers. China is also developing its own hardware -- Huawei isn't slacking -- and it's not that far behind. And I'd bet there's no such thing as a "GPU Level" block that can't be hacked away.

Such a move would also be transparently dystopian... though, in fairness, I suppose that makes it more plausible than it would otherwise be...

reply
they will use National Security as a pretense to force everyone on "verified-aligned AI".

if Uncle Sam has not approved your model, it will be illegal to run it as a AI risk.

Americans have swallowed even worse limitations on their freedoms, so nobody will even notice that, because all notices will be sent to hyperscalers, neoclouds, and other large operators of GPU farms

reply
... NATO? The EU's biggest AI provider sells DeepSeek and GLM.
reply
lol
reply
[dead]
reply