upvote
A news story was just released with allegations that he had an affair with one of his reports as well: https://www.nytimes.com/2026/11/11/technology/jensen-huang-n...
reply
The public face of one of the most important companies in the USA has been compromised.

He risked his future, the value of his company and shareholders to commit adultery.

What else is he doing? How can his word be trusted? Who else is influencing him? Do people have blackmail from such encounters?

All fair questions to ask now.

reply
We cannot be sure that we know the full story behind it, nor that we ever will.
reply
why on earth would this be an okay thing? could you follow a leader you couldn't trust hasn't sold all of your IP to competitors?
reply
I don't believe in IP protections, so yes, easily.
reply
deleted
reply
What if I told you selling IP to someone else is the opposite of it being free to use.
reply
When you say this in a job interview it tends to be a fairly short job interview.
reply
Apparently we all lie a lot during the interviews.
reply
It worked for trump.
reply
So he had an affair with a woman. Who cares. He's human. He's not a spy. This whole charade to dethrone the founder of the biggest company in the world is a joke. I hope the NVDA board are not stupid or they should all resign.
reply
As is the pearl clutching about an "affair", as if it's not going on with lots of other executives that we simply don't know about.
reply
What else did Jensen do?

There needs to be an else?

reply
Uhm ... yes? Screwing around is not a crime. That is something Huang should settle with his family. His wife may divorce of forgive him, but a divorce is not something that the company should fire anyone over.

The fact that he slept with a suspected Chinese spy is not a crime either. Now, if he has enabled industrial espionage, helped circumvent sanctions or broke other laws it is a different matter. But marital infidelity seems insufficient as a cause to fire a CEO of a highly successful company.

I did not follow the story much, so might be missing some important information.

reply
He also sold chips worth billions to her "mistress" and the chips probably went to China. So he did circumvent sanctions. Thats the only crime I recognise in this matter.
reply
These are Trump political sanction. NVDA is a multinational company out to maximize profits for shareholder. Selling to China should not be on any sanctions list. China is not the enemy of anything in my book.
reply
Allegedly. We will no doubt learn all about this from national security council operations this year. But we don’t know what happened or what he did or did not know right now.
reply
> The fact that he slept with a suspected Chinese spy is not a crime either.

He's not being prosecuted; the legality or not of his actions is meaningless.

> His wife may divorce

Which could be awkward for NVDA if there is no prenup as I've seen reported.

> But marital infidelity seems insufficient as a cause to fire a CEO

If that infidelity opens you up to blackmail, it definitely gets up there as a fireable reason.

reply
Screwing around is not a crime, but he also isn't under threat of prison time. He's under threat of losing his job, because he has shown that his judgement cannot be trusted (he had two illicit affairs, one of which was with a subordinate). It's perfectly reasonable to fire someone from a leadership position for having bad judgement.
reply
thats rich, coming from an Epstein Island nation...

where are those epstein files, by the way ?

reply
Alleged relationship with a sub-ordinate.
reply
God. Who cares.
reply
Plot twist: what if this was the China’s goal? Maybe they sent the spy and then leaked the story (or waited for it to leak) to remove Jensen?
reply
Jensen's been lobbying hard for years to get the government to allow selling high-end GPUs to China. It's his position that this will discourage local competitors from getting big enough to meaningfully threaten nVidia's dominance.

While there's nothing inherently incorrect about this position, the affair with an alleged spy means that he, personally and uniquely, cannot advocate for this policy without seeming compromised. Ironically, if nVidia agrees with him, they have to fire him.

reply
> This doesn't seem like a healthy move for the company's longevity.

Who cares? Consequences have actions, and hopefully that's not just based on which choice is gonna make someone the most money.

reply
That seems like a stretch. companies have faced far worse. this is not Enron or something
reply