upvote
I'm going to guess the 2nd affair with a direct report who rose quickly through the ranks is from the board's perspective the more egregious of the two failings.

And: the public only knows what's made it out. Who knows what else has come out in private.

reply
deleted
reply
I think that's a nothing-burger but it's enough to force him out. They probably have more cards in the play. Unfortunately we will never know of them.
reply
Having sex with a report is a very serious no no. There are very valid questions of one's ability to consent when your boss is also your partner.
reply
Oh come on, having sex with a coworker is rape now? This is getting ridiculous. Why not just go the whole way and require all sexual activity to come with with a signed and notarized consent form?
reply
Quid pro quo sexual harassment is not a “nothing-burger”.
reply
You don't think the board of a listed company care about the CEOs bit on the side is being promoted? That's really not a good look for a company to admit that.
reply
It's one thing to happen and another to put that out in the open.

Officials are corrupted? CEOs sleeping with other women including his subordinates? Snow is white? What's the deal? People at that level are basically playing politics, not laws.

However, the fact that someone decided to release all those information as PUBLIC, and followed that up with ANOTHER scandal, means that they are determined to get rid of them. As you said, it is indeed serious matter.

As the Chineses say: "Something weights as light as a quarter of pound if it's left alone, but can weight a thousand tons if put on the scale".

reply
> CEOs sleeping with other women including his subordinates? Snow is white? What's the deal?

The problem is that you don't think it is a problem. It goes on because there are no consequences.

Maybe in '29 the Epstein perps will actually be prosecuted

reply
Because reality deems that this is not really the problem, I was about to mention the Epstein thing -- everything in that file is 100x worse than what Jensen did.

If we (the common people) really want consequences, we will need to do a LOT more and put things in our own hands instead of relying on our representatives -- oh but that's too populist for HN's taste.

reply
> we will need to do a LOT more and put things in our own hands instead of relying on our representatives -- oh but that's too populist for HN's taste.

I'm with you on the first half, and see the second half changing. The fever may have broken in the US electorate.

reply
But the original news was not what sealed the deal, it was the follow up.
reply
Nvidia will be just fine
reply
I feel like "not having a succession plan" should be a fireable offence on its own.

Otherwise you end up thinking "should I start an affair with this Chinese spy I've been breaking US laws with? What are they going to do, fire me? They can't, I've got them trapped so I'm untouchable, I can do whatever I want. And if I'm in a helicopter crash then it sucks to be them, I'll not care when I'm dead".

reply
Imagine having to explain that line of reasoning to Congress in four months. "Yes, Senator, we know our CEO was facilitating chip smuggling to China while in a relationship with a Chinese spy, but we figured that it would just be too risky to replace him at this time."
reply
> Huang has his fingers in every pie; he's not the hands off type

well, yeah.

reply
"an affair with a spy is not great" rather undersells the situation - there could be criminal liability.
reply