upvote
Yeah, this is the biggest concern that I have regarding this whole story.
reply
It's obviously the biggest concern.

Either through technical means, or simpler: by law for American providers. It's hard to believe the administration was not aware of Jensen's affiliations all this time. And time is pressing for Anthropic and OpenAI.

Only conjectures for now, time will tell

reply
Is there a source for this? I googled it and this was claimed to be satire
reply
Not really tbf, it's an extrapolation. As far as I am concerned, there is growing concern, with Anthropic coordinated lobbying against open weights. The point I am making is we need strong Hardware actors consistently standing for hardware neutrality and integrity. Historically, NVIDIA has been very pro open weights. But at the same time, in-silicon guardrails seem to become the new thing: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49879883

Makes you wonder what would happen if the US ever wanted to enforce "certified US AI" on its chips

reply
I'm curious how effective something like that would really be.

Nvidia can certainly put up some guardrails that will sound impressive to the dinosaurs in Congress, but can it really stop China from using those GPUs anyway?

This is a simplification, but is this not in some way similar to how the Switch 1 has hacked due to a design flaw on Nvidia's Tegra chip?

In the same way, even if their GPUs get this protection, wouldn't a state actor figure out how to get around it?

reply
Definitely, expect future GPUs to run only signed LLM models with mandatory online attestation and reporting.
reply
> I hope this won't change NVIDIA's refusal to block inference..

lol had to read this several times due to all the negatives

finally got it - "I hope NVIDIA continue to allow inference..."

reply
Wow. Finally found a human in the comments
reply